exercise:C04b09a77f: Difference between revisions

From Stochiki
(Created page with "<div class="d-none"><math> \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Here is an elegant method due to Guibas and Odlyzko<ref group="Notes" >L. J. Guibas and A. M. Odlyzko, “String Overlaps, Pattern Matching, and Non-transitive Games,” ''Journal of Combinatorial Theory,'' Series A, vol. 30 (1981), pp. 183--208.<...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all}
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all}
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Here is an elegant method due to Guibas and
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Here is an elegant method due to Guibas and Odlyzko<ref group="Notes" >L. J.
Odlyzko<ref group="Notes" >L. J.
Guibas and A. M. Odlyzko, “String Overlaps, Pattern Matching, and Non-transitive Games,”
Guibas and A. M. Odlyzko, “String Overlaps, Pattern Matching, and
''Journal of Combinatorial Theory,'' Series A, vol. 30 (1981),pp. 183--208.</ref> to obtain the expected time to reach a pattern, say HTH, for the first time.  Let <math>f(n)</math> be the number of sequences of length <math>n</math> which do not have the pattern HTH.  Let <math>f_p(n)</math> be the number of sequences that have the pattern for the first time after <math>n</math> tosses. To each element of <math>f(n)</math>, add the pattern HTH.  Then divide the resulting sequences into three subsets: the set where HTH occurs for the first time at time <math>n + 1</math> (for this, the original sequence must have ended with HT); the set where HTH occurs for the first time at time <math>n + 2</math> (cannot happen for this pattern); and the set where the sequence HTH occurs for the first time at time <math>n + 3</math> (the original sequence ended with anything except HT).  Doing this, we have
Non-transitive Games,”
''Journal of Combinatorial Theory,'' Series A, vol. 30 (1981),
pp. 183--208.</ref> to obtain
the expected time to reach a pattern, say HTH, for the first time.  Let <math>f(n)</math>
be the
number of sequences of length <math>n</math> which do not have the pattern HTH.  Let
<math>f_p(n)</math> be the
number of sequences that have the pattern for the first time after <math>n</math> tosses.  
To each
element of <math>f(n)</math>, add the pattern HTH.  Then divide the resulting sequences
into three subsets: the set where HTH occurs for the first time at time <math>n + 1</math>
(for this, the original sequence must have ended with HT); the set where HTH
occurs for the first time at time <math>n + 2</math> (cannot happen for this pattern); and
the set where the sequence HTH occurs for the first time at time <math>n + 3</math> (the
original sequence ended with anything except HT).  Doing this, we have


<math display="block">
<math display="block">

Latest revision as of 00:45, 16 June 2024

[math] \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}[/math]

Here is an elegant method due to Guibas and Odlyzko[Notes 1] to obtain the expected time to reach a pattern, say HTH, for the first time. Let [math]f(n)[/math] be the number of sequences of length [math]n[/math] which do not have the pattern HTH. Let [math]f_p(n)[/math] be the number of sequences that have the pattern for the first time after [math]n[/math] tosses. To each element of [math]f(n)[/math], add the pattern HTH. Then divide the resulting sequences into three subsets: the set where HTH occurs for the first time at time [math]n + 1[/math] (for this, the original sequence must have ended with HT); the set where HTH occurs for the first time at time [math]n + 2[/math] (cannot happen for this pattern); and the set where the sequence HTH occurs for the first time at time [math]n + 3[/math] (the original sequence ended with anything except HT). Doing this, we have

[[math]] f(n) = f_p(n + 1) + f_p(n + 3)\ . [[/math]]

Thus,

[[math]] \frac{f(n)}{2^n} = \frac{2f_p(n + 1)}{2^{n + 1}} + \frac{2^3f_p(n + 3)}{2^{n + 3}}\ . [[/math]]

If [math]T[/math] is the time that the pattern occurs for the first time, this equality states that

[[math]] P(T \gt n) = 2P(T = n + 1) + 8P(T = n + 3)\ . [[/math]]

Show that if you sum this equality over all [math]n[/math] you obtain

[[math]] \sum_{n = 0}^\infty P(T \gt n) = 2 + 8 = 10\ . [[/math]]

Show that for any integer-valued random variable

[[math]] E(T) = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty P(T \gt n)\ , [[/math]]

and conclude that [math]E(T) = 10[/math]. Note that this method of proof makes very clear that [math]E(T)[/math] is, in general, equal to the expected amount the casino pays out and avoids the martingale system theorem used by Li.

Notes

  1. L. J. Guibas and A. M. Odlyzko, “String Overlaps, Pattern Matching, and Non-transitive Games,” Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, vol. 30 (1981),pp. 183--208.