exercise:15ff89ff70: Difference between revisions

From Stochiki
(Created page with "<div class="d-none"><math> \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> The probability of a royal flush in a poker hand is <math>p = 1/649,40</math>. How large must <math>n</math> be to render the probability of having no royal flush in <math>n</math> hands smaller than <math>1/e</math>?")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="d-none"><math>
The probability of a royal flush in a poker hand is <math>p =1/64940</math>.  How large must <math>n</math> be to render the probability of having no royal flush in <math>n</math> hands smaller than <math>1/e</math>?
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}}
\newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}}
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all}
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> The probability of a royal flush in a poker hand is <math>p =
1/649,40</math>.  How large must <math>n</math> be to render the probability of having no royal
flush in <math>n</math> hands smaller than <math>1/e</math>?

Latest revision as of 13:08, 24 June 2024

The probability of a royal flush in a poker hand is [math]p =1/64940[/math]. How large must [math]n[/math] be to render the probability of having no royal flush in [math]n[/math] hands smaller than [math]1/e[/math]?