guide:D1b8062012: Difference between revisions

From Stochiki
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 32: Line 32:
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}
</math></div>
</math></div>
===Algebraic and Transcendental Functions.===
 
We recall that a real-valued function <math>f</math> of one variable is a polynomial if there exist real numbers <math>a_{0}, a_{1}, . . ., a_{n}</math> such that, for every real number <math>x</math>,  
We recall that a real-valued function <math>f</math> of one variable is a polynomial if there exist real numbers <math>a_{0}, a_{1}, . . ., a_{n}</math> such that, for every real number <math>x</math>,  


Line 150: Line 150:
encountered quite a few such functions already. Although a proof of the next theorem is too
encountered quite a few such functions already. Although a proof of the next theorem is too
advanced to give in this book, it is important to know that it is true.
advanced to give in this book, it is important to know that it is true.
{{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-2|The following functions are transcendental:
{{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-2|The following functions are transcendental:


\item[i]] <math>\ln x,</math>
<ul style{{=}}"list-style-type:lower-roman">
\item[(ii)] <math>e^{x},</math>
<li><math>\ln x,</math> </li>
\item[(iii)] <math>a^{x}, \;\mathrm{for any}\; a  >  0, a \neq 1,</math>
<li><math>e^{x},</math></li>
\item[(iv)] <math>\log_{a}x, \;\mathrm{for any}\; a  >  0, a \neq 1,</math>
<li><math>a^{x}, \;\mathrm{for any}\; a  >  0, a \neq 1,</math></li>
\item[(v)] <math>\sin x, \cos x, \tan x, \cot x, \sec x, \csc x,</math>
<li><math>\log_{a}x, \;\mathrm{for any}\; a  >  0, a \neq 1,</math></li>
\item[(vi)] <math>\arcsin x, \arccos x, \arctan x, \mathrm{arccot} x, \mathrm{arcsec} x, \mathrm{arccsc} x.</math>|}}
<li><math>\sin x, \cos x, \tan x, \cot x, \sec x, \csc x,</math></li>
<li><math>\arcsin x, \arccos x, \arctan x, \mathrm{arccot} x, \mathrm{arcsec} x, \mathrm{arccsc} x.</math></li></ul>|}}
 
Another theorem [not so deep as (5.2), but still beyond the scope of this book] states that if <math>f</math> is
Another theorem [not so deep as (5.2), but still beyond the scope of this book] states that if <math>f</math> is
an algebraic function, then the derivative <math>f'</math> is also algebraic. However, the converse is false. In
an algebraic function, then the derivative <math>f'</math> is also algebraic. However, the converse is false. In
Line 169: Line 172:
these six transcendental functions has a derivative which is algebraic.
these six transcendental functions has a derivative which is algebraic.


\end{exercise}
==General references==
==General references==
{{cite web |title=Crowell and Slesnick’s Calculus with Analytic Geometry|url=https://math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/calc/calc.pdf |last=Doyle |first=Peter G.|date=2008 |access-date=Oct 29, 2024}}
{{cite web |title=Crowell and Slesnick’s Calculus with Analytic Geometry|url=https://math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/calc/calc.pdf |last=Doyle |first=Peter G.|date=2008 |access-date=Oct 29, 2024}}

Latest revision as of 20:40, 19 November 2024

[math] \newcommand{\ex}[1]{\item } \newcommand{\sx}{\item} \newcommand{\x}{\sx} \newcommand{\sxlab}[1]{} \newcommand{\xlab}{\sxlab} \newcommand{\prov}[1] {\quad #1} \newcommand{\provx}[1] {\quad \mbox{#1}} \newcommand{\intext}[1]{\quad \mbox{#1} \quad} \newcommand{\R}{\mathrm{\bf R}} \newcommand{\Q}{\mathrm{\bf Q}} \newcommand{\Z}{\mathrm{\bf Z}} \newcommand{\C}{\mathrm{\bf C}} \newcommand{\dt}{\textbf} \newcommand{\goesto}{\rightarrow} \newcommand{\ddxof}[1]{\frac{d #1}{d x}} \newcommand{\ddx}{\frac{d}{dx}} \newcommand{\ddt}{\frac{d}{dt}} \newcommand{\dydx}{\ddxof y} \newcommand{\nxder}[3]{\frac{d^{#1}{#2}}{d{#3}^{#1}}} \newcommand{\deriv}[2]{\frac{d^{#1}{#2}}{dx^{#1}}} \newcommand{\dist}{\mathrm{distance}} \newcommand{\arccot}{\mathrm{arccot\:}} \newcommand{\arccsc}{\mathrm{arccsc\:}} \newcommand{\arcsec}{\mathrm{arcsec\:}} \newcommand{\arctanh}{\mathrm{arctanh\:}} \newcommand{\arcsinh}{\mathrm{arcsinh\:}} \newcommand{\arccosh}{\mathrm{arccosh\:}} \newcommand{\sech}{\mathrm{sech\:}} \newcommand{\csch}{\mathrm{csch\:}} \newcommand{\conj}[1]{\overline{#1}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb} [/math]

We recall that a real-valued function [math]f[/math] of one variable is a polynomial if there exist real numbers [math]a_{0}, a_{1}, . . ., a_{n}[/math] such that, for every real number [math]x[/math],

[[math]] f(x) = a_{0} + a_{1}x + ... + a_{n}x^{n} = \sum_{k = 0}^{n} a_{k}x^k. [[/math]]

Thus, among the different functions [math]f[/math] defined respectively by

[[math]] \begin{array}{ll} \mbox{(a)}\;\;\; f(x) = x^3 + 17x - 2, \;\;\; &\mbox{(f)}\;\;\; f(x) = \frac{1}{x}, \\ \mbox{(b)}\;\;\; f(x) = \pi x^2, &\mbox{(g)}\;\;\; f(x) = \frac{1}{1 + x^2},\\ \mbox{(c)}\;\;\; f(x) = e^{x}, &\mbox{(h)}\;\;\; f(x) = 5, \\ \mbox{(d)}\;\;\; f(x) = x^{e}, &\mbox{(i)}\;\;\; f(x) = \sqrt{x + 1}, \\ \mbox{(e)}\;\;\; f(x) = \sin x, &\mbox{(j)}\;\;\; f(x) = e(x - 1), \end{array} [[/math]]

only those defined in (a), (b), (h), and (j) are polynomials, and the rest are not. In asserting, for example, that the trigonometric function [math]\sin[/math] is not a polynomial, it is important to realize that we are stating more than just the obvious fact that [math]\sin x[/math] does not look like a finite sum of terms of the form [math]a_{k}x^k[/math]. We are asserting that it is impossible to write [math]\sin x[/math] in this form. The easiest way to prove this is to find some one property which every polynomial has and which [math]\sin[/math] does not have. For example, if [math]f[/math] is a polynomial, then the derivative [math]f'[/math] is a polynomial of degree one less. Hence the [math]j[/math]th derivative [math]f^{(j)}[/math] is the constant function zero, if [math]j[/math] is chosen big enough. On the other hand, the [math]j[/math]th derivative [math]\frac{d^j}{dx^j} \sin x[/math] is equal to [math]\pm \cos x[/math] or [math]\pm \sin x[/math], and is therefore never a constant. This proves that the function [math]\sin[/math] is not a polynomial. Similarly, a real-valued function [math]F[/math] of two variables will be defined to be a polynomial if there exist real numbers [math]a_{ij}, i = 0, . . ., m[/math] and [math]j = 0, . . ., n[/math], such that, for every pair of real numbers [math]x[/math] and [math]y[/math],

[[math]] F(x, y) = \sum_{i = 0}^{m} \sum_{j = 0}^{n} a_{i j} x^{i} y^{j}. [[/math]]

An alternative formulation, which avoids writing the double sum, is to define a polynomial in two variables to be a function which is the sum of functions each one of which is defined by an expression [math]ax^{i}y^{j}[/math], where [math]a[/math] is a constant, and [math]i[/math] and [math]j[/math] are nonnegative integers. Examples of polynomials in two variables are those functions defined by

[[math]] \begin{array}{ll} \mbox{(a)}\;\;\; & F(x, y) = x^3 + 2x^{2}y + xy^{3}, \\ \mbox{(b)}\;\;\; & G(x, y) = (x + y)yx, \\ \mbox{(c)}\;\;\; & f(x, y) = 17xy, \\ \mbox{(d)}\;\;\; & H(x, y) = 7x + 2,\\ \mbox{(e)}\;\;\; & h(x, y) = 3. \end{array} [[/math]]

We come now to the two principal definitions of this section. A function [math]f[/math] of one variable is said to be an algebraic function if there exists a polynomial [math]F[/math] in two variables such that [math]F(x, f(x)) = 0[/math], for every [math]x[/math] in the domain of [math]f[/math]. A transcendental function is one which is not algebraic. Example The two functions

[[math]] (a)\; f(x) = \frac{x^2 + 1}{2x^3 - 1}, \;\;\;(b)\; g(x) = \sqrt{x^3 + 2}, [[/math]]

are both algebraic. To show that [math]f[/math] is an algebraic function, let [math]y = \frac{x^2 + 1}{2x^3 - 1}[/math]. Then [math]y(2x^3 - 1) = x^2 + 1[/math], or, equivalently, [math] 2x^{3}y - y - x^{2} -1 = 0[/math]. Hence if we let [math]F[/math] be the polynomial defined by

[[math]] F(x, y) = 2x^{3}y - y - x^{2} - 1, [[/math]]

it will be true that [math]F(x, f(x)) = 0[/math]. This is not surprising, since the polynomial [math]F(x, y)[/math] was invented precisely to make the last equation true. Checking, we get


[[math]] \begin{eqnarray*} F(x, f(x)) &=& 2x^{3} \frac{x^{2} + 1}{2x^3 - 1} - \frac{x^{2} + 1}{2x^{3} - 1} - x^2 - 1\\ &=& (2x^3 - 1) \frac{x^2 +1}{2x^3 - 1} - x^2 - 1 \\ &=& x^2 + 1 - x^2 - 1 = 0. \end{eqnarray*} [[/math]]


The function [math]g[/math] can be shown to be algebraic by letting [math]y = \sqrt{x^3 + 2}[/math]. Squaring both sides, we obtain [math]y^2 = x^3 + 2[/math], which is equivalent to [math]y^2 - x^3 - 2 = 0[/math]. Hence if we define the polynomial [math]F[/math] by the equation

[[math]] F(x, y) = y^2 - x^3 - 2, [[/math]]

then [math]F(x, g(x)) = 0[/math]. Checking, we have

[[math]] \begin{eqnarray*} F(x, g(x)) &=& (\sqrt {x^3 + 2})^2 - x^3 - 2\\ &=& x^3 + 2 - x^3 - 2 = 0. \end{eqnarray*} [[/math]]


A rational function is one which can be expressed as the ratio of two polynomials. That is, a function [math]f[/math] of one variable is rational if there exist polynomials [math]p[/math] and [math]q[/math] of one variable such that [math]f(x) = \frac{p(x)}{q(x)}[/math]. The technique used in Example 1 to show that the function [math]\frac{x^2 + 1}{2x^3 - 1}[/math] is algebraic can be applied to any rational function of one variable. Thus we have the theorem

Theorem

Any rationalfunction [math]f[/math] of one variable is algebraic.


Show Proof

Since [math]f[/math] is rational, there exist polynomials [math]p[/math] and [math]q[/math] such that [math]f(x) = \frac{p(x)}{q(x)}[/math]. Letting [math]y = \frac{p(x)}{q(x)}[/math], we obtain [math]yq(x) = p(x)[/math], which is equivalent to [math]yq(x)-p(x) = 0[/math]. The function [math]F[/math] defined by

[[math]] F(x, y) = yq(x) - p(x) [[/math]]
is a polynomial in [math]x[/math] and [math]y[/math]. Substituting [math]f(x)[/math] for [math]y[/math], and then [math]\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}[/math] for [math]f(x)[/math], we obtain

[[math]] \begin{eqnarray*} F(x, f(x)) &=& f(x)q(x) - p(x)\\ &=& \frac{p(x)}{q(x)} q(x) - p(x)\\ &=& p(x) - p(x) = 0, \end{eqnarray*} [[/math]]
which completes the proof.

The function [math]g[/math] defined by [math]g(x) = \sqrt{x^3 + 2}[/math] is an example of an algebraic function which is not rational. (A simple proof of this fact is suggested in Problem 2.) Thus the set of all rational functions of one variable is a proper subset of the larger set of all algebraic functions of one variable. It is by no means obvious that transcendental functions exist. However, we have actually encountered quite a few such functions already. Although a proof of the next theorem is too advanced to give in this book, it is important to know that it is true.

Theorem

The following functions are transcendental:

  • [math]\ln x,[/math]
  • [math]e^{x},[/math]
  • [math]a^{x}, \;\mathrm{for any}\; a \gt 0, a \neq 1,[/math]
  • [math]\log_{a}x, \;\mathrm{for any}\; a \gt 0, a \neq 1,[/math]
  • [math]\sin x, \cos x, \tan x, \cot x, \sec x, \csc x,[/math]
  • [math]\arcsin x, \arccos x, \arctan x, \mathrm{arccot} x, \mathrm{arcsec} x, \mathrm{arccsc} x.[/math]

Another theorem [not so deep as (5.2), but still beyond the scope of this book] states that if [math]f[/math] is an algebraic function, then the derivative [math]f'[/math] is also algebraic. However, the converse is false. In particular, we know that

[[math]] \frac{d}{dx} \ln x = \frac{1}{x}, [[/math]]

and [math]\frac{1}{x}[/math] is not only algebraic, but also rational. In addition, the formulas in Section 4 for the derivatives of the inverse trigonometric functions show that every one of these six transcendental functions has a derivative which is algebraic.

General references

Doyle, Peter G. (2008). "Crowell and Slesnick's Calculus with Analytic Geometry" (PDF). Retrieved Oct 29, 2024.