guide:6fc6f4d16a: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb} | \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb} | ||
</math></div> | </math></div> | ||
We shall return to the definite integral in Section 3. The purpose of the present digression is to develop some techniques, applicable not only to the study of the integral but also to many other parts of mathematics. | We shall return to the definite integral in Section 3. The purpose of the present digression is to develop some techniques, applicable not only to the study of the integral but also to many other parts of mathematics. | ||
Most of the functions studied in this book have as domains intervals on the real line, or unions of intervals; e.g., the domain of the function <math>\frac{1}{x}</math> is the union <math>(-\infty, 0) \cup (0, \infty)</math>. In this section, on the other hand, we are concerned with functions whose domains are sets of integers. An example is the function a defined by <math>a(n) = \sqrt{n - 2}</math>, for every integer greater than 1. If <math>a</math> is a function whose domain is a subset of the integers, it is common practice to denote its value at <math>n</math> by <math>a_n</math>. Thus | Most of the functions studied in this book have as domains intervals on the real line, or unions of intervals; e.g., the domain of the function <math>\frac{1}{x}</math> is the union <math>(-\infty, 0) \cup (0, \infty)</math>. In this section, on the other hand, we are concerned with functions whose domains are sets of integers. An example is the function a defined by <math>a(n) = \sqrt{n - 2}</math>, for every integer greater than 1. If <math>a</math> is a function whose domain is a subset of the integers, it is common practice to denote its value at <math>n</math> by <math>a_n</math>. Thus | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
We come next to the definition of a sequence, which is a special case of a function defined on a set of integers. We shall accept the intuitive idea of a sequence to be that of a list (in mathematics, most likely, a list of numbers). With this in mind, we define a '''sequence''' to be a function whose domain <math>D</math> is a set of integers such that | We come next to the definition of a sequence, which is a special case of a function defined on a set of integers. We shall accept the intuitive idea of a sequence to be that of a list (in mathematics, most likely, a list of numbers). With this in mind, we define a '''sequence''' to be a function whose domain <math>D</math> is a set of integers such that | ||
#<math>D</math> is a set of consecutive integers; i.e., if <math>i</math> and <math>j</math> are in <math>D</math>, then every integer between <math>i</math> and <math>j</math> is also in <math>D</math>. | |||
then every integer between <math>i</math> and <math>j</math> is also in <math>D</math>. | #<math>D</math> contains a least element. | ||
If <math>s</math> is a sequence and if <math>l</math> is the least, or smallest, integer in its domain, then <math>s(l) = s_{l}</math> is the first member of the sequence, <math>s(l + 1) = s_{l + 1}</math> is the second member, and so on. In the most common applications <math>l</math> is either 0 or 1, and so the values of the sequence appear as either <math>s_0, s_1, s_2,...</math> or as <math>s_1, s_2, ...</math>. | If <math>s</math> is a sequence and if <math>l</math> is the least, or smallest, integer in its domain, then <math>s(l) = s_{l}</math> is the first member of the sequence, <math>s(l + 1) = s_{l + 1}</math> is the second member, and so on. In the most common applications <math>l</math> is either 0 or 1, and so the values of the sequence appear as either <math>s_0, s_1, s_2,...</math> or as <math>s_1, s_2, ...</math>. | ||
A sequence is '''finite''' or '''infinite''' according as its domain <math>D</math> is finite or infinite. Note that the range of an infinite sequence need not contain infinitely many numbers. The function <math>a</math> defined, for every positive integer <math>n</math>, by | A sequence is '''finite''' or '''infinite''' according as its domain <math>D</math> is finite or infinite. Note that the range of an infinite sequence need not contain infinitely many numbers. The function <math>a</math> defined, for every positive integer <math>n</math>, by | ||
Line 59: | Line 58: | ||
a_{n} = a(n) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} | a_{n} = a(n) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} | ||
0, & \mbox{if $n$ is even,} \\ | 0, & \mbox{if $n$ is even,} \\ | ||
1, & \mbox{if | 1, & \mbox{if $n$ is odd,} | ||
\end{array} | \end{array} | ||
\right. | \right. | ||
Line 70: | Line 69: | ||
b_n = 1, \;\;\;\mbox{for every positive integer}\; n. | b_n = 1, \;\;\;\mbox{for every positive integer}\; n. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
A common notation for a sequence <math>s</math>, whether finite or infinite, is <math>\{ s_n \}</math>. When a sequence is written in this way, the letter <math>n</math> is called an '''index'''. Like the variable of integration in a definite integral, it is a dummy symbol. Any letter can be used, although <math>n, m, i, j</math>, and <math>k</math> are the most common. Thus | A common notation for a sequence <math>s</math>, whether finite or infinite, is <math>\{ s_n \}</math>. When a sequence is written in this way, the letter <math>n</math> is called an '''index'''. Like the variable of integration in a definite integral, it is a dummy symbol. Any letter can be used, although <math>n, m, i, j</math>, and <math>k</math> are the most common. Thus | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
s_n = \frac{2n^2 + n - 1}{3n^2 - 2n + 2}, \;\;\; \mbox{for every positive integer}\; n. | s_n = \frac{2n^2 + n - 1}{3n^2 - 2n + 2}, \;\;\; \mbox{for every positive integer}\; n. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
We ask for the limit of <math>\{ s_n \}</math> as <math>n</math> increases without bound, which we denote by <math>\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} s_n</math>. Dividing both numerator and denominator of the above expression by <math>n^2</math>, we obtain | We ask for the limit of <math>\{ s_n \}</math> as <math>n</math> increases without bound, which we denote by <math>\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} s_n</math>. Dividing both numerator and denominator of the above expression by <math>n^2</math>, we obtain | ||
Line 125: | Line 126: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
As we have remarked, the definition of the limit of a sequence is included in the definition of the limit of a function. For emphasis, however, we shall give it in this special case. Let s be an infinite sequence of real numbers. Then '''the limit as <math>n</math> increases without bound of <math>s_n</math> is equal to''' <math>b</math>, written | |||
As we have remarked, the definition of the limit of a sequence is included in the definition of the limit of a function. For emphasis, however, we shall give it in this special case. Let s be an infinite sequence of real numbers. Then '''the limit as | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
\sum_{i = m}^n a_i = a_m + a_{m+1} + ... + a_n. | \sum_{i = m}^n a_i = a_m + a_{m+1} + ... + a_n. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
We call <math>\sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i</math> the '''summation of | |||
We call <math>\sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i</math> the '''summation of <math>\{ a_i \}</math> from <math>m</math> to <math>n</math>.''' | |||
'''Example''' | '''Example''' | ||
Let <math>\{ a_i \}</math> be the sequence defined by <math>a_i = i^2</math>, for every positive integer <math>i</math>. Then | Let <math>\{ a_i \}</math> be the sequence defined by <math>a_i = i^2</math>, for every positive integer <math>i</math>. Then | ||
Line 149: | Line 151: | ||
\sum_{i = 3}^{6}a_i = \sum_{i = 3}^{6} i^2 = 3^2 + 4^2 + 5^2 + 6^2 = 86. | \sum_{i = 3}^{6}a_i = \sum_{i = 3}^{6} i^2 = 3^2 + 4^2 + 5^2 + 6^2 = 86. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
On the other hand, we might be interested in the sum of the squares of the first <math>n</math> integers for an arbitrary positive integer <math>n</math>. This would be the series | On the other hand, we might be interested in the sum of the squares of the first <math>n</math> integers for an arbitrary positive integer <math>n</math>. This would be the series | ||
Line 155: | Line 158: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
The symbol <math>i</math> which appears in the series <math> \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i</math> is called the '''summation index'''. It, too, is a dummy symbol, since the value of the series does not | The symbol <math>i</math> which appears in the series <math> \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i</math> is called the '''summation index'''. It, too, is a dummy symbol, since the value of the series does not | ||
depend on <math>i</math>. Like the definite integral, <math> \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i</math> depends on three things: the sequence <math>a</math> (the function) and the two integers <math>m</math> and <math>n</math>. Thus | depend on <math>i</math>. Like the definite integral, <math> \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i</math> depends on three things: the sequence <math>a</math> (the function) and the two integers <math>m</math> and <math>n</math>. Thus | ||
Line 177: | Line 180: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
It should be emphasized that the summation notation offers no new mathematical theory. It is merely a convenient shorthand for writing sums and manipulating them. The ability to manipulate comes from practice, but the techniques are based on the following properties: | It should be emphasized that the summation notation offers no new mathematical theory. It is merely a convenient shorthand for writing sums and manipulating them. The ability to manipulate comes from practice, but the techniques are based on the following properties: | ||
{{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-1| | {{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-1| | ||
<ul style{{=}}"list-style-type:numeric"> | |||
<li> | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\sum_{i = m}^{n} (a_{i} + b_{i}) = \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_{i} + \sum_{i = m}^{n} b_{i}. | \sum_{i = m}^{n} (a_{i} + b_{i}) = \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_{i} + \sum_{i = m}^{n} b_{i}. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</li> | |||
<li> | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\sum_{i = m}^{n} ca_{i} = c \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_{i}. | \sum_{i = m}^{n} ca_{i} = c \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_{i}. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</li> | |||
<li> | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\sum_{i = m}^{n} c = c (n - m + 1). | \sum_{i = m}^{n} c = c (n - m + 1). | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
|The proofs are very simple. For (2.1) we have | |The proofs are very simple. For (2.1) we have | ||
Line 221: | Line 231: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
This completes the proof.}} | This completes the proof.}} | ||
There are two other summation identities which are useful and which we shall include. They are the formulas for the sum of the first <math>n</math> positive integers and for the sum of the squares of the first <math>n</math> positive integers: | There are two other summation identities which are useful and which we shall include. They are the formulas for the sum of the first <math>n</math> positive integers and for the sum of the squares of the first <math>n</math> positive integers: | ||
{{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-4| | {{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-4| | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
\sum_{i = 1}^{n} i = \frac{n(n+1)} {2}. | \sum_{i = 1}^{n} i = \frac{n(n+1)} {2}. | ||
</math> | </math>|There is a very clever proof of (2.4), which the great mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) is said to have figured out for himself in a few seconds in his first arithmetic class at the age of 10. Write the sum <math>S =\sum_{i = 1}^{n} i</math>, once in natural order and, underneath it, the sum in reverse order as follows: | ||
|There is a very clever proof of (2.4), which the great mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) is said to have figured out for himself in a few seconds in his first arithmetic class at the age of 10. Write the sum <math>S =\sum_{i = 1}^{n} i</math>, once in natural order and, underneath it, the sum in reverse order as follows: | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
Line 243: | Line 249: | ||
2S = n(n + 1), | 2S = n(n + 1), | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
from which (2.4) is an immediate corollary. | from which (2.4) is an immediate corollary.}} | ||
Formula (2.5) is probably most easily proved by induction on <math>n</math>. The proof is straightforward, and we omit it.}} | {{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-5| | ||
<math display="block"> | |||
\sum_{i = 1}^{n} i^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n + 1)}{6}. | |||
</math> | |||
|Formula (2.5) is probably most easily proved by induction on <math>n</math>. The proof is straightforward, and we omit it.}} | |||
'''Example''' | '''Example''' | ||
Evaluate | Evaluate | ||
<ul style="list-style-type:lower-alpha"> | |||
<li><math>\sum_{i = 1}^{n} (3i^2 + 5i - 2),</math></li> | |||
<li><math>\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{(3i^2 + 5i -2)}{n^3}.</math></li> | |||
</ul> | |||
Using the various properties of summation, we obtain for (a), | Using the various properties of summation, we obtain for (a), | ||
Line 260: | Line 274: | ||
\end{eqnarray*} | \end{eqnarray*} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Part (b) is really a trivial | Part (b) is really a trivial modification of (a). The number <math>n^3</math> which appears in the denominator is the same for each term in the sum, i.e., it is a constant, and can be factored out immediately. Thus | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
Line 274: | Line 288: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
We conclude the section with an example which combines the summation convention with the limit of an infinite sequence, | |||
'''Example''' | '''Example''' | ||
For every positive integer <math>n</math>, let <math>S_n</math> be defined by | For every positive integer <math>n</math>, let <math>S_n</math> be defined by | ||
Line 309: | Line 323: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
==General references== | ==General references== | ||
{{cite web |title=Crowell and Slesnick’s Calculus with Analytic Geometry|url=https://math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/calc/calc.pdf |last=Doyle |first=Peter G.|date=2008 |access-date=Oct 29, 2024}} | {{cite web |title=Crowell and Slesnick’s Calculus with Analytic Geometry|url=https://math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/calc/calc.pdf |last=Doyle |first=Peter G.|date=2008 |access-date=Oct 29, 2024}} |
Latest revision as of 01:01, 23 November 2024
We shall return to the definite integral in Section 3. The purpose of the present digression is to develop some techniques, applicable not only to the study of the integral but also to many other parts of mathematics. Most of the functions studied in this book have as domains intervals on the real line, or unions of intervals; e.g., the domain of the function [math]\frac{1}{x}[/math] is the union [math](-\infty, 0) \cup (0, \infty)[/math]. In this section, on the other hand, we are concerned with functions whose domains are sets of integers. An example is the function a defined by [math]a(n) = \sqrt{n - 2}[/math], for every integer greater than 1. If [math]a[/math] is a function whose domain is a subset of the integers, it is common practice to denote its value at [math]n[/math] by [math]a_n[/math]. Thus
A simple example in which the domain is a finite set of integers is a partition of an interval in which we have indexed the points of the partition as [math]x_0, . . ., x_n[/math]. In this case,
We come next to the definition of a sequence, which is a special case of a function defined on a set of integers. We shall accept the intuitive idea of a sequence to be that of a list (in mathematics, most likely, a list of numbers). With this in mind, we define a sequence to be a function whose domain [math]D[/math] is a set of integers such that
- [math]D[/math] is a set of consecutive integers; i.e., if [math]i[/math] and [math]j[/math] are in [math]D[/math], then every integer between [math]i[/math] and [math]j[/math] is also in [math]D[/math].
- [math]D[/math] contains a least element.
If [math]s[/math] is a sequence and if [math]l[/math] is the least, or smallest, integer in its domain, then [math]s(l) = s_{l}[/math] is the first member of the sequence, [math]s(l + 1) = s_{l + 1}[/math] is the second member, and so on. In the most common applications [math]l[/math] is either 0 or 1, and so the values of the sequence appear as either [math]s_0, s_1, s_2,...[/math] or as [math]s_1, s_2, ...[/math].
A sequence is finite or infinite according as its domain [math]D[/math] is finite or infinite. Note that the range of an infinite sequence need not contain infinitely many numbers. The function [math]a[/math] defined, for every positive integer [math]n[/math], by
is the infinite sequence 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, .... An even simpler example of an infinite sequence is the constant function [math]b[/math] defined by
A common notation for a sequence [math]s[/math], whether finite or infinite, is [math]\{ s_n \}[/math]. When a sequence is written in this way, the letter [math]n[/math] is called an index. Like the variable of integration in a definite integral, it is a dummy symbol. Any letter can be used, although [math]n, m, i, j[/math], and [math]k[/math] are the most common. Thus
Of course, a finite sequence can be described by simply enumerating its terms, e.g., [math]s_1, . . ., s_n[/math], or [math]a_3, a_4, . . ., a_{10}[/math]. We shall study two major topics in this section. The first is the limit of an infinite sequence. This is actually just an application of the idea of the limit of a function which we defined and studied in Chapter 1. As an example, let s be the infinite sequence defined by
We ask for the limit of [math]\{ s_n \}[/math] as [math]n[/math] increases without bound, which we denote by [math]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} s_n[/math]. Dividing both numerator and denominator of the above expression by [math]n^2[/math], we obtain
If [math]n[/math] is very large, it is clear that [math]2 + \frac{1}{n} - \frac{1}{n^2}[/math] is nearly equal to 2, and that [math]3 - \frac{2}{n} + \frac{2}{n^2}[/math] is nearly equal to 3. We conclude that the number which the values of the sequence are approaching, i.e., the limit, is [math]\frac{2}{3}[/math]. Thus we write
Example
Let [math]\{s_n \}[/math] and [math]\{a_m\}[/math] be two infinite sequences defined, respectively, by
Find [math]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} s_n[/math] and [math]\lim_{m \rightarrow \infty} a_m[/math]. For the sequence [math]s[/math], we divide numerator and denominator by [math]\sqrt{n}[/math], getting
Both [math]\frac{5}{n}[/math] and [math]\frac{2}{n}[/math] obviously approach 0 as a limit as [math]n[/math] increases without bound. We conclude that
For the sequence [math]\{ a_m \}[/math] we have
It is obvious that, as [math]m[/math] increases without bound, so does [math]m + \frac{1}{m}[/math]. Hence no limit exists. On the other hand, we can unambiguously express the fact that the values of the sequence are increasing without bound by writing
As we have remarked, the definition of the limit of a sequence is included in the definition of the limit of a function. For emphasis, however, we shall give it in this special case. Let s be an infinite sequence of real numbers. Then the limit as [math]n[/math] increases without bound of [math]s_n[/math] is equal to [math]b[/math], written
if, for [math]\varepsilon \gt 0[/math], there exists an integer [math]m[/math] in the domain of [math]s[/math] such that whenever [math]n \gt m[/math], then [math]|s_{n} - b| \lt \varepsilon[/math]. The definition can be phrased geometrically as follows: The limit of [math]\{ s_n \}[/math] is [math]b[/math] if, given an arbitrary open interval [math](b - \varepsilon, b + \varepsilon)[/math], all the numbers [math]s_{n}[/math] from some integer on, lie in that interval. Thus for the oscillating sequence 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,... defined in (1), no limit exists. The second topic in the section is the study of a convenient notation for the sum of a finite number of consecutive terms of a sequence. Let [math]a[/math] be a sequence (finite or infinite) of real numbers. If [math]m[/math] and [math]n[/math] are in the domain of the sequence, and if [math]m \leq n[/math], then the sum [math]a_m + a_{m+1}, + ... + a_n[/math] is called a series and is abbreviated [math]\sum_{i = m}^{n} a_{i}[/math]. Thus
We call [math]\sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i[/math] the summation of [math]\{ a_i \}[/math] from [math]m[/math] to [math]n[/math].
Example Let [math]\{ a_i \}[/math] be the sequence defined by [math]a_i = i^2[/math], for every positive integer [math]i[/math]. Then
Another series defined from the same sequence is
On the other hand, we might be interested in the sum of the squares of the first [math]n[/math] integers for an arbitrary positive integer [math]n[/math]. This would be the series
The symbol [math]i[/math] which appears in the series [math] \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i[/math] is called the summation index. It, too, is a dummy symbol, since the value of the series does not
depend on [math]i[/math]. Like the definite integral, [math] \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_i[/math] depends on three things: the sequence [math]a[/math] (the function) and the two integers [math]m[/math] and [math]n[/math]. Thus
Example
Using the summation notation, write a series for the sum of all the odd integers from 11 to 101. An arbitrary odd integer can be written in the form [math]2i + 1[/math] for some integer [math]i[/math]. It is not hard to see, therefore, that one answer to the problem is given by the series
Another is the series
It should be emphasized that the summation notation offers no new mathematical theory. It is merely a convenient shorthand for writing sums and manipulating them. The ability to manipulate comes from practice, but the techniques are based on the following properties:
-
[[math]] \sum_{i = m}^{n} (a_{i} + b_{i}) = \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_{i} + \sum_{i = m}^{n} b_{i}. [[/math]]
-
[[math]] \sum_{i = m}^{n} ca_{i} = c \sum_{i = m}^{n} a_{i}. [[/math]]
-
[[math]] \sum_{i = m}^{n} c = c (n - m + 1). [[/math]]
The proofs are very simple. For (2.1) we have
There are two other summation identities which are useful and which we shall include. They are the formulas for the sum of the first [math]n[/math] positive integers and for the sum of the squares of the first [math]n[/math] positive integers:
There is a very clever proof of (2.4), which the great mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777-1855) is said to have figured out for himself in a few seconds in his first arithmetic class at the age of 10. Write the sum [math]S =\sum_{i = 1}^{n} i[/math], once in natural order and, underneath it, the sum in reverse order as follows:
Formula (2.5) is probably most easily proved by induction on [math]n[/math]. The proof is straightforward, and we omit it.
Example Evaluate
- [math]\sum_{i = 1}^{n} (3i^2 + 5i - 2),[/math]
- [math]\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \frac{(3i^2 + 5i -2)}{n^3}.[/math]
Using the various properties of summation, we obtain for (a),
Part (b) is really a trivial modification of (a). The number [math]n^3[/math] which appears in the denominator is the same for each term in the sum, i.e., it is a constant, and can be factored out immediately. Thus
Hence, using the answer from (a), we get
We conclude the section with an example which combines the summation convention with the limit of an infinite sequence,
Example
For every positive integer [math]n[/math], let [math]S_n[/math] be defined by
The numbers [math]S_1, S_2, S_3, ,...[/math] form an infinite sequence, and the problem is to evaluate [math]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} S_n[/math]. Using the properties of summation, we obtain
Hence
which is the answer to the problem. Frequently the notations are compounded; i.e., we write
General references
Doyle, Peter G. (2008). "Crowell and Slesnick's Calculus with Analytic Geometry" (PDF). Retrieved Oct 29, 2024.