guide:550877833d: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb} | \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb} | ||
</math></div> | </math></div> | ||
For every power series | For every power series | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i(x - a)^i, | \sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i(x - a)^i, | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
the | the '''function defined by the power series''' is the function <math>f</math> which, to every real number <math>c</math> at which the power series converges, assigns the real number <math>f(c)</math> given by | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
This is not a trivial result. To prove it, we begin with the following theorem: | This is not a trivial result. To prove it, we begin with the following theorem: | ||
{{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-1|A power series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i</math> and its derived series <math>\sum_{i=1}^\infty ia_{i} (x-a)^{i-1}</math> have the same radius of convergence. | {{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-1|A power series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i</math> and its derived series <math>\sum_{i=1}^\infty ia_{i} (x-a)^{i-1}</math> have the same radius of convergence. | ||
In Section 6 we showed that the essential difference between the power series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i</math> and the corresponding series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}x^i</math> is that the interval of convergence of one is obtained from that of the other by translation. In particular, both series have the same radius of convergence. To prove (7.1), it is therefore sufficient (and rotationally easier) to prove the same result for power series about the origin 0. We shall therefore prove the following: | In Section 6 we showed that the essential difference between the power series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i</math> and the corresponding series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}x^i</math> is that the interval of convergence of one is obtained from that of the other by translation. In particular, both series have the same radius of convergence. To prove (7.1), it is therefore sufficient (and rotationally easier) to prove the same result for power series about the origin 0. We shall therefore prove the following: If the power series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}x^i</math> has radius of convergence <math>\rho</math> and if the derived series <math>\sum_{i=1}^\infty ia_{i}x^{i-1}</math> has radius of convergence <math>\rho'</math>, then <math>\rho = \rho'</math>. | ||
|Suppose that <math>\rho < \rho'</math>, and let <math>c</math> be an arbitrary real number such that <math>\rho < c < \rho'</math>. Then the series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}c^i</math> diverges, whereas the series <math>\sum_{i=1}^\infty i a_{i}c^{i-1}</math> converges absolutely. Since <math>c</math> is positive, | |Suppose that <math>\rho < \rho'</math>, and let <math>c</math> be an arbitrary real number such that <math>\rho < c < \rho'</math>. Then the series <math>\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}c^i</math> diverges, whereas the series <math>\sum_{i=1}^\infty i a_{i}c^{i-1}</math> converges absolutely. Since <math>c</math> is positive, | ||
Line 89: | Line 90: | ||
\end{equation} | \end{equation} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Next, suppose that <math>\rho' < \rho</math>. We shall derive a contradiction from this assumption also, which, together with the inequality (1), proves that <math>\rho' = \rho</math>. Let <math>b</math> and <math>c</math> be any two real numbers such that <math>\rho' < b < c < \rho</math>. It follows | Next, suppose that <math>\rho' < \rho</math>. We shall derive a contradiction from this assumption also, which, together with the inequality (1), proves that <math>\rho' = \rho</math>. Let <math>b</math> and <math>c</math> be any two real numbers such that <math>\rho' < b < c < \rho</math>. It follows | ||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Let <math>d</math> be an arbitrary real number such that <math>|c| < d < \rho</math> (see Figure 9). | Let <math>d</math> be an arbitrary real number such that <math>|c| < d < \rho</math> (see Figure 9). | ||
<div id="fig 9.9" class="d-flex justify-content-center"> | <div id{{=}}"fig 9.9" class{{=}}"d-flex justify-content-center"> | ||
[[File:guide_c5467_scanfig9_9.png | 400px | thumb | ]] | [[File:guide_c5467_scanfig9_9.png | 400px | thumb | ]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 218: | Line 218: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
The left side of this inequality can be made arbitrarily small by taking <math>|x-c|</math> sufficiently small. But this is precisely the meaning of the assertion in (2), and so the proof is finished.}} | The left side of this inequality can be made arbitrarily small by taking <math>|x-c|</math> sufficiently small. But this is precisely the meaning of the assertion in (2), and so the proof is finished.}} | ||
'''Example''' | '''Example''' | ||
Line 278: | Line 279: | ||
\ln (1 + x) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^{k-1} \frac{x^k}{k} | \ln (1 + x) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^{k-1} \frac{x^k}{k} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
has been shown to hold ''only for values of | has been shown to hold ''only for values of <math>x</math> which are interior points of the interval of convergence of the power series.'' It certainly does not hold at points outside the interval of convergence where the series diverges. As far as the endpoints of the interval are concerned, it can be proved that a function defined by a power series is continuous at every point of its interval of convergence. Hence the above equation does in fact hold for <math>x = 1</math>, and we therefore obtain the following formula for the sum of the alternating harmonic series: | ||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
Line 294: | Line 295: | ||
f^{(n)}(x) = \sum_{i=n}^\infty i(i - 1) \cdots (i - n + 1)a_i(x - a)^{i-n} , | f^{(n)}(x) = \sum_{i=n}^\infty i(i - 1) \cdots (i - n + 1)a_i(x - a)^{i-n} , | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
for every <math>x</math> such that <math>|x - a| < \rho</math>.|}} | |||
Is it possible for a function <math>f</math> to be defined by two different power series about the same number <math>a</math>? The answer is no, provided the domain of <math>f</math> is not just the single number <math>a</math>. The reason, as the following corollary of Theorem (7.3) shows, is that the coefficients of any power series about <math>a</math> which defines <math>f</math> are uniquely determined by the function <math>f</math>. | Is it possible for a function <math>f</math> to be defined by two different power series about the same number <math>a</math>? The answer is no, provided the domain of <math>f</math> is not just the single number <math>a</math>. The reason, as the following corollary of Theorem (7.3) shows, is that the coefficients of any power series about <math>a</math> which defines <math>f</math> are uniquely determined by the function <math>f</math>. | ||
{{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-4|lf <math>f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i(x-a)^i</math> and if the radius of convergence of the power series is not zero, then, for every integer <math>n \geq 0</math>, | {{proofcard|Theorem|theorem-4|lf <math>f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i(x-a)^i</math> and if the radius of convergence of the power series is not zero, then, for every integer <math>n \geq 0</math>, | ||
Line 311: | Line 314: | ||
\end{eqnarray*} | \end{eqnarray*} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
for every <math>x</math> such that <math>|x-a| < \rho</math>. Setting <math>x = a</math>, we obtain | for every <math>x</math> such that <math>|x-a| < \rho</math>. Setting <math>x = a</math>, we obtain | ||
Line 318: | Line 322: | ||
from which the desired conclusion follows.}} | from which the desired conclusion follows.}} | ||
==General references== | ==General references== | ||
{{cite web |title=Crowell and Slesnick’s Calculus with Analytic Geometry|url=https://math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/calc/calc.pdf |last=Doyle |first=Peter G.|date=2008 |access-date=Oct 29, 2024}} | {{cite web |title=Crowell and Slesnick’s Calculus with Analytic Geometry|url=https://math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/calc/calc.pdf |last=Doyle |first=Peter G.|date=2008 |access-date=Oct 29, 2024}} |
Latest revision as of 00:03, 21 November 2024
For every power series
the function defined by the power series is the function [math]f[/math] which, to every real number [math]c[/math] at which the power series converges, assigns the real number [math]f(c)[/math] given by
The domain of [math]f[/math] is obviously equal to the interval of convergence of the power series. Speaking more casually, we say simply that the function [math]f[/math] is defined by the equation
As an example, let [math]f[/math] be the function defined by
This power series was studied in Example 1 of Section 6 and was shown to converge for all values of [math]x[/math]. Thus the domain of the function which the series defines is the set of all real numbers. Functions defined by power series have excellent analytic properties. One of the most important is the fact that every such function is differentiable and that its derivative is the function defined by the power series obtained by differentiating the original series term by term. That is, if
then
This is not a trivial result. To prove it, we begin with the following theorem:
A power series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i[/math] and its derived series [math]\sum_{i=1}^\infty ia_{i} (x-a)^{i-1}[/math] have the same radius of convergence. In Section 6 we showed that the essential difference between the power series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i[/math] and the corresponding series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}x^i[/math] is that the interval of convergence of one is obtained from that of the other by translation. In particular, both series have the same radius of convergence. To prove (7.1), it is therefore sufficient (and rotationally easier) to prove the same result for power series about the origin 0. We shall therefore prove the following: If the power series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}x^i[/math] has radius of convergence [math]\rho[/math] and if the derived series [math]\sum_{i=1}^\infty ia_{i}x^{i-1}[/math] has radius of convergence [math]\rho'[/math], then [math]\rho = \rho'[/math].
Suppose that [math]\rho \lt \rho'[/math], and let [math]c[/math] be an arbitrary real number such that [math]\rho \lt c \lt \rho'[/math]. Then the series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}c^i[/math] diverges, whereas the series [math]\sum_{i=1}^\infty i a_{i}c^{i-1}[/math] converges absolutely. Since [math]c[/math] is positive,
Next, suppose that [math]\rho' \lt \rho[/math]. We shall derive a contradiction from this assumption also, which, together with the inequality (1), proves that [math]\rho' = \rho[/math]. Let [math]b[/math] and [math]c[/math] be any two real numbers such that [math]\rho' \lt b \lt c \lt \rho[/math]. It follows from the definition of [math]\rho'[/math] that the series [math]\sum_{i=1}^\infty ia_{i}b^{i-1}[/math] diverges. Similarly, from the definition of [math]\rho[/math], we know that the series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}c^i[/math] converges, and therefore [math]\lim_{i \rightarrow \infty} a_ic^i = 0[/math]. Because [math]c[/math] is positive, it follows that there exists a positive integer [math]N[/math] such that, for every integer [math]i \geq N[/math],
Note that Theorem (7.1) does not state that a power series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i[/math] and its derived series have the same intertval of convergence, but only that they have the same radius of convergence. For example, in Example 1(b), page 514, the interval of convergence of the power series [math]\sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^{k-1} \frac{x^k}{k}[/math] is shown to be the half-open interval [math](-1,1][/math]. However, the derived series is
which does not converge for [math]x = 1[/math]. It is a geometric series having the open interval of convergence [math](-1, 1)[/math].
Let [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i[/math] be a power series, and let [math]f[/math] and [math]g[/math] be the two functions defined respectively by [math]f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x-a)^i[/math] and by [math]g(x) = \sum_{i=1}^\infty ia_{i}(x -a)^{i-1}[/math]. We have proved that there is an interval, which, with the
possible exception of its endpoints, is the common domain of [math]f[/math] and [math]g[/math]. However, we have not yet proved that the function [math]g[/math] is the derivative of the function [math]f[/math]. This fact is the content of the following theorem.
THEOREM. If the radius of convergence [math]\rho[/math] of the power series [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i (x-a)^i[/math] is not zero, then the function [math]f[/math] defined by [math]f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i(x-a)^i[/math] is differentiable at ecery [math]x[/math] such that [math]|x-a| \lt \rho[/math] and
It is a direct consequence of the Chain Rule that if (7.2) is proved for [math]a = 0[/math], then it is true in general. We shall therefore assume that [math]f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty a_ix^i[/math]. Let [math]g[/math] be the function defined by [math]g(x) = \sum_{i=1}^\infty i a_i x^{i-1}[/math], and let [math]c[/math] be an arbitrary number such that [math]|c| \lt \rho[/math]. We must prove that [math]f'(c)[/math], which can be defined by
Henceforth, we shall consider only values of [math]x[/math] which lie in the closed interval [math][-d, d][/math]. For every such [math]x[/math] other than [math]c[/math], we have
Example
(a) Show that
for every real number [math]x[/math], and (b) show that
for every real number [math]x[/math] such that [math]|x| \lt 1[/math]. For (a), let [math]f[/math] be the function defined by [math]f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty \frac{x^i}{i!}[/math]. We have already shown that the domain of [math]f[/math] is the set of all real numbers; i.e., the radius of convergence is infinite. It follows from the preceding theorem that
Since [math]\frac{i}{i!} = \frac{1}{(i- 1)!}[/math], we obtain
where the last equation is obtained by replacing [math]i - 1[/math] by [math]k[/math]. Thus we have proved that
The function [math]f[/math] therefore satisfies the differential equation [math]\frac{dy}{dx} = y[/math], whose general solution is [math]y = ce^x[/math]. Hence [math]f(x) = ce^x[/math] for some constant [math]c[/math]. But it is obvious from the series which defines [math]f[/math] that [math]f(0) = 1[/math]. It follows that [math]c = 1[/math], and (a) is proved. A similar technique is used for (b). Let [math]f(x) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^{k-1} \frac{x^k}{k}[/math]. The domain of [math]f[/math] is the half-open interval [math](-1, 1][/math], and the radius of convergence is 1. Hence
for [math]|x| \lt 1[/math]. The latter is a geometric series with sum equal to [math]\frac{1}{1 + x}[/math]. Hence we have shown that
Integration yields
Since [math]|x| \lt 1[/math], we have [math]|1 + x| = (1 + x)[/math]. From the series which defines [math]f[/math] we see that [math]f(0) = 0[/math]. Hence
lt follows that [math]f(x) = \ln(1 + x)[/math] for every real number [math]x[/math] such that [math]|x| \lt 1[/math], and (b) is therefore established.
Example 1 illustrates an important point. The domain of the function [math]f[/math] defined by [math]f(x) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^{k-1} \frac{x^k}{k} [/math] is the half-open interval [math](-1, 1][/math]. On the other hand, the domain of the function [math]\ln(1 + x)[/math] is the unbounded interval [math](-1, \infty)[/math]. It is essential to realize that the equation
has been shown to hold only for values of [math]x[/math] which are interior points of the interval of convergence of the power series. It certainly does not hold at points outside the interval of convergence where the series diverges. As far as the endpoints of the interval are concerned, it can be proved that a function defined by a power series is continuous at every point of its interval of convergence. Hence the above equation does in fact hold for [math]x = 1[/math], and we therefore obtain the following formula for the sum of the alternating harmonic series:
Let [math]\sum_{i=0}^\infty a_{i}(x - a)^i[/math] be a power series with a nonzero radius of convergence [math]\rho[/math], and let [math]f[/math] be the function defined by the power series
for every [math]x[/math] in the interval of convergence. By iterated applications of Theorem (7.2), i.e., first to the series, then to the derived series, then to the derived series of the derived series, etc., we may conclude that [math]f[/math] has derivatives of arbitrarily high order within the radius of convergence. The formula for the nth derivative is easily seen to be
Is it possible for a function [math]f[/math] to be defined by two different power series about the same number [math]a[/math]? The answer is no, provided the domain of [math]f[/math] is not just the single number [math]a[/math]. The reason, as the following corollary of Theorem (7.3) shows, is that the coefficients of any power series about [math]a[/math] which defines [math]f[/math] are uniquely determined by the function [math]f[/math].
lf [math]f(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty a_i(x-a)^i[/math] and if the radius of convergence of the power series is not zero, then, for every integer [math]n \geq 0[/math],
The radius of convergence [math]\rho[/math] is not zero, and so the formula in (7.3) holds. Since [math]i(i-1) \cdots (i - n + 1) = \frac{i!}{(i-n)!}[/math], we obtain
for every [math]x[/math] such that [math]|x-a| \lt \rho[/math]. Setting [math]x = a[/math], we obtain
General references
Doyle, Peter G. (2008). "Crowell and Slesnick's Calculus with Analytic Geometry" (PDF). Retrieved Oct 29, 2024.