guide:812f824494: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="d-none"><math> | |||
\newcommand{\indicator}[1]{\mathbbm{1}_{\left[ {#1} \right] }} | |||
\newcommand{\Real}{\hbox{Re}} | |||
\newcommand{\HRule}{\rule{\linewidth}{0.5mm}} | |||
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> | |||
For a real-valued function <math>f(x)</math> with <math>\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2dx < \infty</math>, Fourier transforms are defined as follows | |||
<span id{{=}}"eq:fourierIntegral_A"/><span id{{=}}"eq:inverseFourierIntegral_A"/> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align} | |||
\label{eq:fourierIntegral_A} | |||
\widehat f(u)&=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iux}f(x)dx\\ | |||
\label{eq:inverseFourierIntegral_A} | |||
f(x)&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\widehat f(u)du\ . | |||
\end{align} | |||
</math> | |||
The Fourier transforms in \eqref{eq:fourierIntegral_A} and \eqref{eq:inverseFourierIntegral_A} are somewhat different from traditional definitions, which are | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\widehat f(u)&=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-2\pi iux}f(x)dx\\ | |||
f(x)&=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{2\pi iux}\widehat f(u)du\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
The reason we choose \eqref{eq:fourierIntegral_A} in finance is because we work so much with probability theory, and as probabilists we like to have a Fourier transform of a density be equal to a characteristic function. However, nothing changes and we are able to carry out all the same calculations; the difference amounts merely to a change of variable inside the integrals. | |||
==Some Basic Properties== | |||
<ul style{{=}}"list-style-type:lower-roman"><li>Linearity: if <math>\psi(s) = af(s)+bg(s)</math>, then | |||
<math display="block">\widehat \psi(u) = a\widehat f(u)+b\widehat g(u)\ .</math></li> | |||
<li>Translation/Time Shifting: if <math>f(s) = \psi(s-s_0)</math>, then | |||
<math display="block">\widehat f(u)= e^{ius_0}\widehat \psi(u)\ .</math></li> | |||
<li>Convolution: for <math>f*g(x) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y)g(x-y)dy</math>, | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\widehat {f*g}(u) &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iux} \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y)g(x-y)dydx\\ | |||
&=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iuy}f(y)\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iu(x-y)} g(x-y)dxdy\\ | |||
& = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iuy}f(y)\widehat g(u)dy\\ | |||
&=\widehat f(u)\widehat g(u)\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math></li> | |||
<li>Reverse Convolution: | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\widehat{\widehat f*\widehat g}(x) &= \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \widehat f(v)\widehat g(u-v)dvdu\\ | |||
&= \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ivx} \widehat f( v) \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i(u- v)x}\widehat g(u- v)dudv\\ | |||
&=g(x)\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i vx} \widehat f( v)dv\\ | |||
&= 2\pi g(x)f(x)\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math></li> | |||
</ul> | |||
An important concept to realize about Fourier is that functions <math>(e^{iux})_{u\in\mathbb R}</math> can be thought of as orthonormal basis elements in a linear space. Similar to finite-dimensional vector spaces, we can write a function as a some inner products with the basis elements. Indeed, that is what we accomplish with the inverse Fourier transform; we can think of the integral as a sum, | |||
<math display="block">f(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\widehat f(u)du\approx\frac{1}{2\pi} \sum_{n=1}^N e^{-iu_nx}\widehat f(u_n) \ ,</math> | |||
where <math>u_n</math> are discrete points <math>\mathbb C</math> (this is a similar idea to Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT)). The basis elements are orthogonal in the sense that | |||
<math display="block">\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iux}e^{-ivx}dx = \delta_0(u-v)\ .</math> | |||
Finally, it needs to be pointed out that the function <math>\delta_0</math> is something that defined under integrals, and is rather hard to formalize outside. For instance, in Parseval's identity, we used <math>\delta_0</math>, but only inside the integral: | |||
{{proofcard|Proposition|proposition-1|For a real-valued function <math>f(x)</math> with <math>\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2dx < \infty</math>, | |||
<math display="block">\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2ds =\frac{1}{2\pi}\ \int_{-\infty}^\infty |\widehat f(u)|^2du\ .</math> | |||
| | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty |\widehat f(u)|^2du&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \widehat f(u)\overline{ \widehat f(u)}du\\ | |||
&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iux}f(x)e^{-iuy}f(y)dxdydu\\ | |||
&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)f(y) \left(\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iux}e^{-iuy}du\right)dxdy\\ | |||
&=\int_{-\infty}^\infty \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)f(y) \delta_0(y-x)dxdy\\ | |||
&=\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(x)f(x) dx \ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math>}} | |||
==Regularity Strips== | |||
For some function <math>f:\mathbb R\rightarrow \mathbb R</math> we modify \eqref{eq:fourierIntegral_A} and \eqref{eq:inverseFourierIntegral_A} to accommodate non-integrability and/or non-differentiability. We write | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\widehat f(u)&=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iux}f(x)dx\\ | |||
f(x)&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{iz-\infty}^{iz+\infty} e^{-iux}\widehat f(u)du\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
where <math>z=\Im(u)</math>. The region of <math>z</math> values where the Fourier transform is defined is called ''the regularity strip.'' This comes in handy for functions like the European call and put payoffs. | |||
'''Example''' | |||
For a call option, <math>f(x) = (e^s-K)^+</math>. This function has <math>\int_{\log K}^\infty |f(s)|^2ds =\infty</math> and non-differentiability at <math>s=\log(K)</math>. However, we can still write a Fourier transform: | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\widehat f(u)&= \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{ius}(e^s-K)^+ds\\ | |||
&= \int_{\log K}^\infty e^{s+ius}ds-K\int_{\log K}^\infty e^{ius}ds\\ | |||
&= \frac{e^{s+ius}}{1+iu}\Big|_{s=\log K}^\infty -\frac{Ke^{ius}}{iu}\Big|_{s=\log K}^\infty\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
where the anti-derivative of <math>e^{ius}</math> and <math>e^{s+ius}</math> are the same as they are for real variables because the function is analytic in the complex plain. For <math>z=\Im(u) > 1</math>, the anti-derivative will be zero when evaluated at <math>s=\infty</math>, will be infinite for <math>z < 1</math>, and undefined for <math>z=1</math>. Taking <math>z > 1</math>, we have | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\widehat f(u) | |||
&= -\frac{e^{(1+iu)\log(K)}}{1+iu}+\frac{Ke^{iu\log(K)}}{iu}\\ | |||
&= -\frac{\left(e^{\log(K)}\right)^{(1+iu)}}{1+iu}+\frac{K\left(e^{\log(K)}\right)^{iu}}{iu}\\ | |||
&= \frac{K^{1+iu}}{iu-u^2}\ , | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
as shown in [[guide:0875016693#tab:payoffs |Table]] of [[guide:0875016693#chapt:stochVol |Chapter]]. | |||
'''Example''' | |||
For a put option, <math>f(x) = (K-e^s)^+</math>. This function has <math>\int_{\log K}^\infty |f(s)|^2ds < \infty</math>, like the put option is non-differentiability at <math>s=\log(K)</math>. Repeating the steps from the previous example, it follows that the regularity strip is <math>z=\Im(u) < 0</math> (see [[guide:0875016693#tab:payoffs |Table]] of [[guide:0875016693#chapt:stochVol |Chapter]]). | |||
==The Wave Equation== | |||
Consider the wave (transport) equation, | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}V(t,x)&=a\frac{\partial}{\partial x}V(t,x)\\ | |||
V(0,x)&=f(x)\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
The solution can be found with Fourier transforms: | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}-a\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)V(t,x) &=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}-a\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)e^{-iux}\widehat V(t,u)\\ | |||
&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux} \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}+aiu\right)\widehat V(t,u)\ , | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
or simply | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\widehat V(t,u)&=-aiu\widehat V(t,u)\ ,\\ | |||
\widehat V(0,u)&=\widehat f(0)\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
The solution is | |||
<math display="block">\widehat V(t,u) = e^{-aiu t}\widehat f(u)\ ,</math> | |||
which we invert to obtain the solution to the wave equation, | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
V(t,x) &= \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}e^{-aiu t}\widehat f(u)du\\ | |||
&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iu(x+ at)}\widehat f(u)du\\ | |||
&=f(x+at)\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
The lines <math>x = c-at</math> are the characteristic lines so that for any <math>c</math> we have <math>v(t,c-at) = f(c)</math>; the initial information <math>f(c)</math> at point <math>c</math> is propagated along the characteristic line. | |||
==The Heat Equation== | |||
Consider the heat equation | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\frac{\partial}{\partial t}V(t,x)&=\frac12\Delta V(t,x)\\ | |||
V(0,x)&=f(x)\ , | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
where and <math>\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2dx < \infty</math>. For scalar <math>x</math> we have <math>\Delta =\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}</math>, and the inverse Fourier transform yields an ODE under the integral sign, | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}-\frac12\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\right)V(t,x)&= \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}-\frac12\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\right)e^{-iux}\widehat V(t,u)du\\ | |||
&= \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}+\frac{u^2}{2}\right)\widehat V(t,u)du \\ | |||
&=0\ , | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
or simply, | |||
<span id{{=}}"eq:Vhat_ODE"/> | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align} | |||
\nonumber | |||
\frac{d}{dt}\widehat V(t,u)&=-\frac{u^2}{2}\widehat V(t,u)\\ | |||
\label{eq:Vhat_ODE} | |||
\widehat V(0,u)&=\widehat f(u) \ . | |||
\end{align} | |||
</math> | |||
The solution to \eqref{eq:Vhat_ODE} is | |||
<math display="block">\widehat V(t,u) = \widehat f(u) e^{-\frac{u^2}{2}t}\ .</math> | |||
Applying the inverse Fourier transform yields the solution, | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
V(t,x)& = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\widehat V(t,u)du\\ | |||
& = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\widehat f(u) e^{-\frac{u^2}{2}t}du\\ | |||
& = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\left(\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iuy}f(y) dy\right)e^{-\frac{u^2}{2}t}du\\ | |||
& = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y) \left(\sqrt{\frac{t}{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iu(y-x)} e^{-\frac{u^2}{2}t}du\right)dy\\ | |||
& = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y)\left( \mathbb E e^{i\mathcal Z(y-x)/\sqrt t}\right) dy\qquad\hbox{where $\mathcal Z\sim N(0,1)$}\\ | |||
& = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y) e^{-\frac{(y-x)^2}{2t}}dy\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
In fact, it can be seen as the expectation of a Brownian motion, | |||
<math display="block">V(t,x) = \mathbb Ef(x+W_t)</math> | |||
where <math>W_t</math> is a Brownian motion. If <math>f(x) = \delta_0(x)</math>, then the we have the ''fundamental solution'', | |||
<math display="block">\Phi(t,x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2t}}\ ,</math> | |||
from which solutions for different initial conditions are convolutions, | |||
<math display="block">V(t,x) = f*\Phi(t,x) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y)\Phi(t,x-y)\ .</math> | |||
==The Black-Scholes Equation== | |||
The Black-Scholes model is | |||
<math display="block">\frac{dS_t}{S_t}=rdt+\sigma dW_t^Q</math> | |||
where <math>W^Q</math> is a risk-neutral Brownian motion. Letting <math>X_t=\log(S_t)</math> the Black-Scholes equation is | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}+\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\frac{\partial}{\partial x}-r\right)V(t,x)&=0\\ | |||
V(T,x)&=\psi(x) \ , | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
where <math>\psi(X_T)</math> is the claim, e.g. a call option <math>\psi(x) = (e^x-K)^+</math>. Using the same Fourier techniques as we did with the wave and heat equations, we have | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial t}-\frac{\sigma^2u^2}{2}-iu\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)-r\right)\widehat V(t,u)&=0\\ | |||
\widehat V(T,u)&=\widehat \psi(u) \ , | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
which has solution | |||
<math display="block">\widehat V(t,u)=\widehat\psi(u)e^{-(T-t)\left(\frac{\sigma^2u^2}{2}+iu\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)+r\right)}\ .</math> | |||
Applying the inverse Fourier transform, we arrive at the risk-neutral pricing formula (i.e. Feynman-Kac), | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
V(t,x)&=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\widehat V(t,u)du\\ | |||
&=\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\widehat\psi(u)e^{-(T-t)\left(\frac{\sigma^2u^2}{2}+iu\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\right)}du\\ | |||
&=\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux}\left(\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iuy}\psi(y)dy\right)e^{-(T-t)\left(\frac{\sigma^2u^2}{2}+iu\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\right)}du\\ | |||
&=\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty\int_{-\infty}^\infty \psi(y) e^{iu\left(y-x-(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\right)}e^{-(T-t)\frac{\sigma^2u^2}{2}} dudy\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
Take change of variable <math>y'=y-x-(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)</math> such that <math>dy'=dy</math>, then | |||
<math display="block"> | |||
\begin{align*} | |||
V(t,x)&=\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty\int_{-\infty}^\infty \psi\left(y'+x+(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\right) e^{iuy'}e^{-(T-t)\frac{\sigma^2u^2}{2}} dudy'\\ | |||
&=\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \psi\left(y'+x+(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\right)\left( \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iuy'}e^{-(T-t)\frac{\sigma^2u^2}{2}} du\right)dy'\\ | |||
&=\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2(T-t)}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \psi\left(y'+x+(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\right)\left(\mathbb E e^{i\frac{\mathcal Z}{\sigma\sqrt{T-t}}y'}\right)dy'\\ | |||
&=\frac{e^{-r(T-t)}}{\sqrt{2\pi\sigma^2(T-t)}}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \psi\left(y'+x+(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)\right)e^{-\frac12\frac{\left(y'\right)^2}{\sigma^2(T-t)}}dy'\\ | |||
&=e^{-r(T-t)}\mathbb E^Q\psi\left(x+(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)+\sigma (W_T^Q-W_t^Q)\right)\\ | |||
&=e^{-r(T-t)}\mathbb E^Q\left[\psi\left(X_T\right)\Big|X_t=x\right]\ . | |||
\end{align*} | |||
</math> | |||
==General references== | |||
{{cite arXiv|last1=Papanicolaou|first1=Andrew|year=2015|title=Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs) for Finance|eprint=1504.05309|class=q-fin.MF}} |
Latest revision as of 00:36, 4 June 2024
For a real-valued function [math]f(x)[/math] with [math]\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2dx \lt \infty[/math], Fourier transforms are defined as follows
The Fourier transforms in \eqref{eq:fourierIntegral_A} and \eqref{eq:inverseFourierIntegral_A} are somewhat different from traditional definitions, which are
The reason we choose \eqref{eq:fourierIntegral_A} in finance is because we work so much with probability theory, and as probabilists we like to have a Fourier transform of a density be equal to a characteristic function. However, nothing changes and we are able to carry out all the same calculations; the difference amounts merely to a change of variable inside the integrals.
Some Basic Properties
- Linearity: if [math]\psi(s) = af(s)+bg(s)[/math], then
[[math]]\widehat \psi(u) = a\widehat f(u)+b\widehat g(u)\ .[[/math]]
- Translation/Time Shifting: if [math]f(s) = \psi(s-s_0)[/math], then
[[math]]\widehat f(u)= e^{ius_0}\widehat \psi(u)\ .[[/math]]
- Convolution: for [math]f*g(x) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y)g(x-y)dy[/math],
[[math]] \begin{align*} \widehat {f*g}(u) &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iux} \int_{-\infty}^\infty f(y)g(x-y)dydx\\ &=\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iuy}f(y)\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iu(x-y)} g(x-y)dxdy\\ & = \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iuy}f(y)\widehat g(u)dy\\ &=\widehat f(u)\widehat g(u)\ . \end{align*} [[/math]]
- Reverse Convolution:
[[math]] \begin{align*} \widehat{\widehat f*\widehat g}(x) &= \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-iux} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \widehat f(v)\widehat g(u-v)dvdu\\ &= \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-ivx} \widehat f( v) \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i(u- v)x}\widehat g(u- v)dudv\\ &=g(x)\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i vx} \widehat f( v)dv\\ &= 2\pi g(x)f(x)\ . \end{align*} [[/math]]
An important concept to realize about Fourier is that functions [math](e^{iux})_{u\in\mathbb R}[/math] can be thought of as orthonormal basis elements in a linear space. Similar to finite-dimensional vector spaces, we can write a function as a some inner products with the basis elements. Indeed, that is what we accomplish with the inverse Fourier transform; we can think of the integral as a sum,
where [math]u_n[/math] are discrete points [math]\mathbb C[/math] (this is a similar idea to Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT)). The basis elements are orthogonal in the sense that
Finally, it needs to be pointed out that the function [math]\delta_0[/math] is something that defined under integrals, and is rather hard to formalize outside. For instance, in Parseval's identity, we used [math]\delta_0[/math], but only inside the integral:
For a real-valued function [math]f(x)[/math] with [math]\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2dx \lt \infty[/math],
Regularity Strips
For some function [math]f:\mathbb R\rightarrow \mathbb R[/math] we modify \eqref{eq:fourierIntegral_A} and \eqref{eq:inverseFourierIntegral_A} to accommodate non-integrability and/or non-differentiability. We write
where [math]z=\Im(u)[/math]. The region of [math]z[/math] values where the Fourier transform is defined is called the regularity strip. This comes in handy for functions like the European call and put payoffs. Example For a call option, [math]f(x) = (e^s-K)^+[/math]. This function has [math]\int_{\log K}^\infty |f(s)|^2ds =\infty[/math] and non-differentiability at [math]s=\log(K)[/math]. However, we can still write a Fourier transform:
where the anti-derivative of [math]e^{ius}[/math] and [math]e^{s+ius}[/math] are the same as they are for real variables because the function is analytic in the complex plain. For [math]z=\Im(u) \gt 1[/math], the anti-derivative will be zero when evaluated at [math]s=\infty[/math], will be infinite for [math]z \lt 1[/math], and undefined for [math]z=1[/math]. Taking [math]z \gt 1[/math], we have
Example For a put option, [math]f(x) = (K-e^s)^+[/math]. This function has [math]\int_{\log K}^\infty |f(s)|^2ds \lt \infty[/math], like the put option is non-differentiability at [math]s=\log(K)[/math]. Repeating the steps from the previous example, it follows that the regularity strip is [math]z=\Im(u) \lt 0[/math] (see Table of Chapter).
The Wave Equation
Consider the wave (transport) equation,
The solution can be found with Fourier transforms:
or simply
The solution is
which we invert to obtain the solution to the wave equation,
The lines [math]x = c-at[/math] are the characteristic lines so that for any [math]c[/math] we have [math]v(t,c-at) = f(c)[/math]; the initial information [math]f(c)[/math] at point [math]c[/math] is propagated along the characteristic line.
The Heat Equation
Consider the heat equation
where and [math]\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|^2dx \lt \infty[/math]. For scalar [math]x[/math] we have [math]\Delta =\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}[/math], and the inverse Fourier transform yields an ODE under the integral sign,
or simply,
The solution to \eqref{eq:Vhat_ODE} is
Applying the inverse Fourier transform yields the solution,
In fact, it can be seen as the expectation of a Brownian motion,
where [math]W_t[/math] is a Brownian motion. If [math]f(x) = \delta_0(x)[/math], then the we have the fundamental solution,
from which solutions for different initial conditions are convolutions,
The Black-Scholes Equation
The Black-Scholes model is
where [math]W^Q[/math] is a risk-neutral Brownian motion. Letting [math]X_t=\log(S_t)[/math] the Black-Scholes equation is
where [math]\psi(X_T)[/math] is the claim, e.g. a call option [math]\psi(x) = (e^x-K)^+[/math]. Using the same Fourier techniques as we did with the wave and heat equations, we have
which has solution
Applying the inverse Fourier transform, we arrive at the risk-neutral pricing formula (i.e. Feynman-Kac),
Take change of variable [math]y'=y-x-(T-t)\left(r-\frac{\sigma^2}{2}\right)[/math] such that [math]dy'=dy[/math], then
General references
Papanicolaou, Andrew (2015). "Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs) for Finance". arXiv:1504.05309 [q-fin.MF].