exercise:26bc28081b: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div class="d-none"><math> \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> We considered the two examples of the Drunkard's Walk corresponding to the cases <math>n = 4</math> and <math>n = 5</math> blocks (see Example). Verify that in these two examples the expected time to absorption,...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} | \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} | ||
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} | \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} | ||
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> We considered the two examples of the Drunkard's | \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> We considered the two examples of the Drunkard's Walk corresponding to the cases <math>n = 4</math> and <math>n =5</math> blocks (see [[guide:87cf36f969#exam 11.2.1 |Example]]). Verify that in these two examples the expected time to absorption, starting at <math>x</math>, is equal to <math>x(n - x)</math>. See if you can prove that this is true in general. '' Hint'': | ||
Walk corresponding to the cases <math>n = 4</math> and <math>n = | Show that if <math>f(x)</math> is the expected time to absorption then <math>f(0) = f(n) = 0</math> and | ||
5</math> blocks | |||
(see [[guide:87cf36f969#exam 11.2.1 |Example]]). Verify that in these two examples the | |||
expected time to | |||
absorption, starting at <math>x</math>, is equal to | |||
<math>x(n - x)</math>. See if you can prove that this is true in general. '' Hint'': | |||
Show | |||
that if <math>f(x)</math> is the expected time to absorption then <math>f(0) = f(n) = 0</math> | |||
and | |||
<math display="block"> | <math display="block"> | ||
f(x) = (1/2)f(x - 1) + (1/2)f(x + 1) + 1 | f(x) = (1/2)f(x - 1) + (1/2)f(x + 1) + 1 | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
for <math>0 < x < n</math>. Show that if <math>f_1(x)</math> and <math>f_2(x)</math> are two solutions, then | for <math>0 < x < n</math>. Show that if <math>f_1(x)</math> and <math>f_2(x)</math> are two solutions, then | ||
their difference <math>g(x)</math> is a solution of the equation | their difference <math>g(x)</math> is a solution of the equation |
Latest revision as of 23:06, 15 June 2024
We considered the two examples of the Drunkard's Walk corresponding to the cases [math]n = 4[/math] and [math]n =5[/math] blocks (see Example). Verify that in these two examples the expected time to absorption, starting at [math]x[/math], is equal to [math]x(n - x)[/math]. See if you can prove that this is true in general. Hint:
Show that if [math]f(x)[/math] is the expected time to absorption then [math]f(0) = f(n) = 0[/math] and
for [math]0 \lt x \lt n[/math]. Show that if [math]f_1(x)[/math] and [math]f_2(x)[/math] are two solutions, then their difference [math]g(x)[/math] is a solution of the equation
Also, [math]g(0) = g(n) = 0[/math]. Show that it is not possible for [math]g(x)[/math] to have a strict maximum or a strict minimum at the point [math]i[/math], where [math]1 \le i \le n-1[/math]. Use this to show that [math]g(i) = 0[/math] for all i. This shows that there is at most one solution. Then verify that the function [math]f(x) = x(n-x)[/math] is a solution.