exercise:A547ad7429: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div class="d-none"><math> \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Here is a trick to try on your friends. Shuffle a deck of cards and deal them out one at a time. Count the face cards each as ten. Ask your friend to look at one of the first ten cards; if this card is a six, she is to look at the card that tur...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} | \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} | ||
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} | \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} | ||
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Here is a trick to try on your friends. Shuffle a deck | \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Here is a trick to try on your friends. Shuffle a deck of cards and deal them out one at a time. Count the face cards each as ten. Ask your friend to look at one of the first ten cards; if this card is a six, she is to look at the card that turns up six cards later; if this card is a three, she is to look at the card that turns up three cards later, and so forth. Eventually she will reach a point where she is to look at a card that turns up <math>x</math> cards later but there are not <math>x</math> cards left. You then tell her the last card that she looked at even though you did not know her starting point. You tell her you do this by watching her, and she cannot disguise the times that she looks at the cards. In fact you just do the same procedure and, even though you do not start at the same point as she does, you will most likely end at the same point. Why? | ||
of cards and deal them out one at a time. Count the face cards each as ten. | |||
Ask | |||
your friend to look at one of the first ten cards; if this card is a six, she | |||
is | |||
to look at the card that turns up six cards later; if this card is a three, she | |||
is to look at the card that turns up three cards later, and so forth. | |||
Eventually she will reach a point where she is to look at a card that turns up | |||
<math>x</math> cards later but there are not <math>x</math> cards left. You then tell her the last | |||
card that she looked at even though you did not know her starting point. You | |||
tell her you do this by watching her, and she cannot disguise the times that | |||
she | |||
looks at the cards. In fact you just do the same procedure and, even though | |||
you | |||
do not start at the same point as she does, you will most likely end at the | |||
same | |||
point. Why? | |||
Latest revision as of 21:17, 15 June 2024
Here is a trick to try on your friends. Shuffle a deck of cards and deal them out one at a time. Count the face cards each as ten. Ask your friend to look at one of the first ten cards; if this card is a six, she is to look at the card that turns up six cards later; if this card is a three, she is to look at the card that turns up three cards later, and so forth. Eventually she will reach a point where she is to look at a card that turns up [math]x[/math] cards later but there are not [math]x[/math] cards left. You then tell her the last card that she looked at even though you did not know her starting point. You tell her you do this by watching her, and she cannot disguise the times that she looks at the cards. In fact you just do the same procedure and, even though you do not start at the same point as she does, you will most likely end at the same point. Why?