exercise:7899711987: Difference between revisions

From Stochiki
(Created page with "<div class="d-none"><math> \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> On September 26, 1980, the ''New York Times'' reported that a mysterious stranger strode into a Las Vegas casino, placed a single bet of 777,00 dollars on the “don't pass” line at the crap table, and walked away with more than 1.5 million doll...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="d-none"><math>
On September 26, 1980, the ''New York Times'' reported that a mysterious stranger strode into a Las Vegas casino, placed a single bet of
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}}
\newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}}
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all}
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> On September 26, 1980, the ''New York Times'' reported
that a mysterious stranger strode into a Las Vegas casino, placed a single bet of
777,00 dollars on the “don't pass” line at the crap table, and walked away with
777,00 dollars on the “don't pass” line at the crap table, and walked away with
more than 1.5 million dollars.  In the “don't pass” bet, the bettor is essentially
more than 1.5 million dollars.  In the “don't pass” bet, the bettor is essentially

Latest revision as of 16:18, 14 June 2024

On September 26, 1980, the New York Times reported that a mysterious stranger strode into a Las Vegas casino, placed a single bet of 777,00 dollars on the “don't pass” line at the crap table, and walked away with more than 1.5 million dollars. In the “don't pass” bet, the bettor is essentially betting with the house. An exception occurs if the roller rolls a 12 on the first roll. In this case, the roller loses and the “don't pass” better just gets back the money bet instead of winning. Show that the “don't pass” bettor has a more favorable bet than the roller.