exercise:33021d4b08: Difference between revisions

From Stochiki
(Created page with "<div class="d-none"><math> \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Which of the genetics examples (Examples \ref{exam 11.1.7},, and) are absorbing?")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all}
\newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all}
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}}
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Which of the genetics examples (Examples \ref{exam
\newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}</math></div> Which of the genetics examples ([[guide:52e01d4de7#exam 11.1.8|Example]] and [[guide:52e01d4de7#exam 11.1.9 |Example]]) are absorbing?
[[guide:52e01d4de7#exam 11.1.8 |11.1.7},]], [[guide:52e01d4de7#exam 11.1.9 |and]]) are absorbing?

Latest revision as of 21:51, 15 June 2024

[math] \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mat}[1]{{\bf#1}} \newcommand{\exref}[1]{\ref{##1}} \newcommand{\secstoprocess}{\all} \newcommand{\NA}{{\rm NA}} \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}[/math]

Which of the genetics examples (Example and Example) are absorbing?